Sarah Jessica Parker’s “Work of Art?”

The contestants of "Work of Art; The Next Great Artist." (perhaps having a title like that is already pushing things a bit?)

The Bravo channel has decided to put out there a television show of competing artists in the spirit of many so called “reality” TV shows.  “Let’s have selected artists compete and the winner gets $100,000 and a solo show at the Brooklyn Art Museum!”  Wow.

I was hopeful.  Really I was.  I heard an interview with Sarah Jessica Parker producer of the program, who admittedly has little art experience but wanted to help promote new artists to a wider audience.  Hallelujah.  That’s a good thing indeed.

What I found after watching excerpts on line was something that was a derivative of MTV’s “Real World” with undergraduate or graduate art students that are still trying to find themselves.  In addition, there is the “Survivor” aspect of the show.  Artists go through various challenges and can get granted immunity from projects as well as folks get voted off the program.  Such contestants are told they didn’t create a “real” work of art and disappear. What was very difficult to stomach was the delayed twenty something teen angst throughout the program.  Putting personality extremes together is tiresome but does create so called authentic tension for the show (the sound track behind these arguments and scuffles I found very enlightening in terms of Bravo’s intent).  Watching I wondered if “Work of Art” was really about art at all or just a drama fest?

Art being evaluated...

What I did enjoy was parts of the art critiques.  The judges clearly show insight regarding the work.  Also when the artists are working on creating pieces and commented upon what they were doing, I was reminded of my undergraduate classes,  something I’m sure that has educational value for a wider audience that doesn’t see that kind of environment on a regular basis.  I just wish the show was more about art and less about fabricated theater.  Did Sarah Jessica Parker watch any of PBS’s ART21 series?  She could learn something.

Here is where you can find info about the show on Bravo:

http://www.bravotv.com/work-of-art

"Work of Art" judges critiquing work.

I’ll warn you- after watching clips on Bravo’s website what I can tell you is all about the ads.  Here is what you will see repeatedly:  1) singing fish, 2) an add that gives the impression that technology will destroy a rabbit, (which appears to be the last vestige of life in a desert wasteland), and 3), images of women swishing their hair about.  And some how in remembering the ads… well, isn’t that TV’s point? Programming what programming?

Here is where you can read some various reviews of “Work of Art”:

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/entertainment/95917494.html

http://www.nola.com/arts/index.ssf/2010/06/post_21.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-08/bravos-work-of-art-is-a-bust/

Advertisements

About abiggerworldyet

Visual Artist Brother Sojourner College Professor Christ follower
This entry was posted in Culture (as best as we are able) and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Sarah Jessica Parker’s “Work of Art?”

  1. Amanda Pewonka! says:

    Tim! I love ‘Work of art’ I guess it is my liking of “reality TV”. I love watching what these people produce, and it is really cool to see it from an outsiders perspective. It reminds me of your classes on speed.

  2. Mary Ann says:

    I really appreciated this show for its focus on art. I was impressed by the various artists’ command of materials. I know I saw a book cover years ago that looked a lot like the one they chose for the HG Wells book so on that, they went for the known, and I think they should have done that contest in high school art classes across the country. I don’t like reality t.v. and don’t like the judging aspect as so much is about how people say things and how people feel in reaction, hence the tension and drama of it. I think they should have divided the $100K into three and shared it between the remaining 3 artists. I didn’t think any one of the top three deserved to beat out the others. I think their group show was great and the best parts of it should be what was to go on display as the ultimate prize win – and the vomiting girls could have been left out!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s